01 AUG 13
A G E N D A
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AUGUST 13, 2001 - 5:30 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. CALL TO ORDER:
PAGES
2. APPROVAL AND/OR
CORRECTION OF MINUTES: Regularly Scheduled Meeting
July 9, 2001
3. VARIANCE REQUEST:
a. Square Footage Variance
26 Wight Circle
Petitioner: Thomas L. Martin 3
b. Vehicle Storage Variance
603 Stevenson Street
Petitioner: Alvin L. Winstead 4-6
ADJOURNMENT
1
MINUTES: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING
DATE AND TIME: August 13, 2001/ 5:35 p.m.- 6:00 p.m.
ATTENDANCE: Acting Chairman John Hardwick, Commissioners:
Bobby Lester and Martha Boyd
City Engineer Whisker
________________________________________________________________________
City Clerk Susan Davitt recorded those listed above in attendance and
Acting Chairman Hardwick declared a quorum.
APPROVAL AND/OR CORRECTION OF MINUTES:
Commissioner Boyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Lester to approve the
minutes of the regular Board of Adjustment meeting of July 9, 2001 as
presented. MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED:
a. SQUARE FOOTAGE VARIANCE/26 WRIGHT CIRCLE
Acting Chairman Hardwick opened the public hearing at approximately 5:36
p.m.
Mr. Thomas L. Martin of 26 Wright Circle related that he is proposing to
construct a 24’ by 36’ shop/garage/storage building unattached from the
primary residence. He presented a plat depicting easement location,
pointing out that there is adequate room between the five-feet required
setback for either side and the ten-foot setback from the fence line to
construct a building of those dimensions. He related that it would have
conventional framed construction, and white vinyl siding to match the
primary residence.
Acting Chairman Hardwick asked if the roof construction would be the same
as the residence.
Mr. Martin explained that the roof of the residence is cable built,
adding that he prefers to have a hip roof for the proposed accessory
building. He then added that he does not have plans at this time to put
mechanical or electrical into the building, but does intend to provide
necessary foundation, footing and slab penetrations for the addition of
that at a later date. He pointed out that he is proposing to construct
the building himself, adding that the electrical would be the most
expensive part. He explained that he has an old classic car that he
would like to move from his driveway and store.
Acting Chairman Hardwick closed the public hearing at approximately 5:40
P.M. and asked about access to the proposed building.
Mr. Martin explained that the location of double gates, which would allow
him access to the proposed building.
2
Acting Chairman Hardwick questioned the need for a 24’ by 36’ accessory
building.
Mr. Martin explained that the proposed building would also be used for
storage and a workshop, further explaining that he is approximately ten
years from retiring.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING
August 13, 2001 continued:
In response to a question regarding the proposed height of the building,
Mr. Martin related that many of the homes in the neighborhood are two-
story and he had considered constructing a second story, but added that
he was undecided. He explained that because he was building the building
himself, he is not sure he would know how to construct a second story and
feels more confident with single story construction. He added that he
felt there would be plenty of time to decide prior to obtaining the
building permit.
Commissioner Lester asked if he had had an opportunity to visit with his
neighbors regarding the proposed building.
Mr. Martin explained that he had spoken with the three immediate
neighbors to his residence and they did not express opposition.
Acting Chairman Hardwick clarified that the request is approximately 33
percent larger than the maximum requirement for an accessory building.
Commissioner Lester noted that the square footage would be 864 feet. He
then questioned similar requests.
City Clerk Susan Davitt agreed with Acting Chairman Hardwick that most
variances granted by the Board of Adjustment have been for a lesser
degree of square footage. She then stated that to her knowledge she was
not aware of any variances that include a second story.
Mr. Martin presented a two story conceptual drawing of the front view of
the proposed building, adding that he is not locked into a two-story
development.
Acting Chairman Hardwick stated that the neighborhood would be marginally
affected by a one-story as opposed to a two-story, and expressed concern
for future use of the building if the property were sold.
Mr. Martin stated he understood there would be no control over future use
of the building if the house sold, but pointed out a high roof metal
building on Wright Street that was already there when he purchased his
home.
Commissioner Lester asked the petitioner if cutting back from 36’ to 32’
feet would hinder his plans, providing for a total of 768 sq. ft.
Mr. Martin responded that it would not.
3
Commissioner Lester moved, seconded by Commissioner Boyd to approve the
request for a single story accessory building 24 by 32 feet totaling 768
sq. ft. and conforming to the residential aesthetics of the residence
located at 26 Wright Circle. MOTION CARRIED.
b. Vehicle Storage Variance/603 Stevenson Street
Acting Chairman Hardwick introduced the item of business and opened the
public hearing at approximately 5:45 p.m.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING
August 13, 2001 continued:
Mr. Alvin Winstead related that he owns a 1936 Dodge panel truck and a
1939 Bantam truck, adding he has constructed a privacy fence to store the
two antique vehicles, he presented photographs to the Board saying that
the vehicles and two car trailers have been moved from the driveway to
the backyard behind the privacy fence. He stated that he is rebuilding
the cars and is currently gathering parts, adding that he has two years
before retiring and plans to keep the cars as projects. He related that
he has obtained a written & signed statement from both adjacent property
owners that they do not object to the Bantam and the Dodge trucks being
enclosed behind the privacy fence at 603 Stevenson Street.
Discussion ensued as to when the Code Enforcement Officer tagged the
vehicles; Mr. Winstead stated that the Code Enforcement Officer told him
that the vehicles have been observed for approximately six years, adding
that he has not owned the Dodge panel truck for six years.
th
Mrs. Winstead interjected that the privacy fence was completed on the 7
thrd
and 10 of July and vehicles were tagged on the 23 of July. Stating
that her point is that they were in the process of moving the vehicles
before they were tagged.
Acting Chairman Hardwick stated that he had questions of a legal nature
regarding Ordinance 1154. He pointed out that the ordinance provides
authority to the Code Enforcement Officer regarding discretion to
ascertain if the antique vehicle is showing signs of restoration.
City Engineer Whisker stated that it was his understanding that the
vehicle did not show signs of restoration and was tagged.
In response to question from Acting Chairman Hardwick, City Engineer
Whisker related that the support data consists of a standard form that is
used to tag the vehicles whether it is in a Street right-of-way or in a
private yard. He related that it is his understanding that the vehicle
can be tagged if it is located in a Street right-of-way plus seven feet.
He related that the ordinance allows seven days for vehicle parked in
yards to be removed. He stated that the car must be operational or show
active signs of restoration.
Acting Chairman Hardwick stated the ordinance outlines considerations for
inoperable vehicles, stored vehicles, and antique vehicles, asking under
4
what category the vehicles were being considered when the vehicles were
tagged.
City Engineer Whisker pointed out that seven days would be the allowable
time limit for inoperable, stored or antique vehicles not showing signs
of restoration.
In response to a question posed by Acting Chairman Hardwick, Alderman
Stroud stated that the primary intent of the ordinance was to address
junk problems for vehicles not being restored. He added that vehicles
stored behind a privacy fence were not directly addressed, other than to
require the vehicle to be in an enclosure.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING
August 13, 2001 continued:
City Engineer Whisker clarified that “enclosed,” meant a garage.
Alderman Stroud related difficulty defining enclosed during the committee
meetings, explaining that at one time it just meant a roof, but was
changed. He went on to say that there were two primary considerations,
one being the appearance from the street and the other being health and
safety issues regarding vehicles placed in backyards and the grass not
being mowed which promotes vermin that may travel to neighboring yards.
Acting Chairman Hardwick remind everyone that the only appeal from the
Board of Adjustment is through the courts, pointing out that this is the
first vehicle storage variance requested since the passage of the
ordinance. He related that his question for legal advice would be if the
Board could grant a variance with an expiration time.
In response to a question by Acting Chairman Hardwick, Mr. Winstead
related assurances that he was collecting the necessary parts to complete
the restoration.
Acting Chairman Hardwick suggested that the item be table until authority
regarding a time factor can be addressed through legal channels.
Commissioner Boyd moved, seconded by Lester to table the item of business
until the next regularly scheduled meeting pending a determination from
the City Attorney regarding the authority to grant a variance of this
nature on a time basis.
Alderman Stroud explained that the City Council’s intent was to
accomplish a cleanup of the blight areas in the City, adding that laws
are of a blanket nature, and become difficult in certain situations to
apply across the board. He stated that it is the City Council’s
responsibility to make laws that will benefit all citizens of
Jacksonville and it is the Board of Adjustment’s responsibility in
certain cases to mitigate extenuating circumstances without circumventing
the City Council’s intent.
At this time, MOTION CARRIED.
5
ADJOURNMENT:
Acting Chairman Hardwick adjourned the meeting at approximately 6:00 p.m.
MOTION CARRIED.
Respectfully,
_________________________ _____________________________
Susan L. Davitt Mark Perry
CITY CLERK - TREASURER CHAIRMAN
6